This is the official website of Lovin Malta’s campaign to stop disinformation and heal partisan divides, starting by enforcing the impartiality rules of the Constitution. We believe political parties should divest their ownership in One TV and Net TV to reduce their susceptibility to corruption.
Don’t just take our word for it. Read the law for yourself.
So what does the Constitution say?
Article 119 of the Constitution* says it is the Broadcasting Authority’s role to ensure that TV broadcasts in Malta are as impartial as possible when it comes to political controversy.
So how can One TV and Net TV exist? Aren’t they the very opposite of that?
In 1991, Parliament passed the Broadcasting Act which allowed the Broadcasting Authority to “consider the general output” of all stations “together as a whole”. In other words, Parliament decided that the propaganda of One TV and Net TV can balance each other out.
This is the law we are challenging in court. The Constitution does not speak about balance. It demands as much impartiality as possible. A Constitutional wrong is not made right because two entities are doing it.
*This is the highest law in the land.
Why should you care?
TV news and current affairs programmes are what keep voters informed. If many people in the country are simply exposed to propaganda, our democracy loses the ability to discuss important ideas, think critically and make informed decisions. We end up in a popularity game between two forces which compete on who can spend the most money to manipulate the masses. This also makes political parties vulnerable to organised crime which can have serious effects on our economy. Malta deserves better than that. You have a right to live in a country where people have wide access to fair and factual information rather than unregulated propaganda.
Years spent breaking Company law by not publishing audited accounts
They depend on corruption and your taxpayer money to survive
Media.Link Communications Company Limited (Latest accounts published 2003)
One Productions Ltd. (Latest accounts published 2010)
Having a debate with friends? Here are some misconceptions you might want to discuss.
Help us fight misinformation
Freedom of expression does not give anybody the right to abuse of their TV licence. In fact, television is a highly regulated sector all over the world because it is the most powerful medium. It is consumed passively, even by the most vulnerable members of society, such as children and the elderly. It is not against freedom of expression to ban the advertising of smoking on TV. Similarly, it is not against freedom of expression to demand as much impartiality as possible in political programming.
No other European country has party-owned TV stations. The following countries explicitly ban political parties from owning media companies: Austria, Bulgaria, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Portugal and the UK. So there is nothing abnormal with disallowing political parties and it does not breach their freedom of expression.
Actually, we are not even saying that the TV stations should close. Those who believe this are already the victims of propaganda against our initiative. All we are saying is that these stations should obey basic laws, like the Constitution, and that the political parties should divest of their ownership in them, even to reduce the financial burden on the parties that inevitably leads to corruption. One TV and Net TV can continue to exist. So can all their employees and programmes. But they should not be owned by political parties and they should strive to be as impartial as possible – not as propagandistic as possible. This is what our Constitution and basic decency rules demand.
It is true that no media is 100% impartial but it is also true that media have an obligation and a duty to be as fair and impartial as possible. Our party media believe they have no such obligation so when they do news or current affairs they are completely propagandistic.
This leads to disinformation which is wrong, even if we know who is behind it. Rape doesn’t stop being wrong because you know who is raping you. Similarly, knowing who owns the stations does not make us immune to the effects of their 24/7 propaganda brainwashing us from when we are very young.
Our political parties both criticise TVM when they’re in Opposition and then exert control over it when they’re in government. They also have a direct interest in undermining TVM because it is a direct competitor to their commercial stations.
Before reforming TVM, the political parties need to divest of their stations. Then they can focus on doing their job as legislators to come up with better regulations. They must start by investing in the Broadcasting Authority but as things stand they will not do that because they have an interest in the Broadcasting Authority being as weak as possible. This conflict of interest must go before real reform can be done.
This is a Kaxxaturi project crowdfunded by concerned citizens
Here’s how it all began…
Last summer, we asked you to support our campaign to bring an end to party-owned stations. You donated over €7,662 to help us mount this historic legal challenge. Our first step is to file a case in the Civil Court, requesting it to declare the Broadcasting Act’s proviso anti-constitutional.
We are supporting this case with ongoing investigative journalism and an information campaign. Your support can help us continue pushing this nationwide debate for broadcasting reform.